The
Irish Tragedy: Scotland's Disgrace...
by John MacLean (1920)
Let me address myself to Scots people particularly at this critical
juncture in the world's history – just as critical as in August, 1914
-- to save Ireland from a tragedy that is bound to come if a stop is
not put to the bloody career of the present Coalition gang of unmitigated
scoundrels.
My plea is that Britain has no right to dominate Ireland with constabulary
armed with bombs, and with an army and navy considered foreign by the
Irish. We Scots have been taught to revere the names of Sir William
Wallace and Robert Bruce because these doughty men of old are recorded
as championing the cause of freedom when Edward I and Edward II tried
to absorb Scotland as part of English territory. All Scots must therefore
appreciate the plight of Ireland, which for over seven centuries has
chafed under the same English yoke, and now ought to stand by Ireland
in her last great effort for freedom; the last because triumph is bound
to be hers very soon.
Ireland's subjection is undemocratic
Right through the war the British Government justified its prosecution
of the war on the ground that it was a war of 'democracy' against Prussianism,
and that the war would guarantee the rights of small nations if the
Allies won.
The Allies have won – or at any rate, America has won. Has democracy
been recognized? Have small nations had their rights? The piteous plight
of Ireland gives the lie direct to those profound prevaricators called
the Coalition Government. The Allies saw to it that a faked plebiscite
was carried through in Alsace-Lorraine and Slesvig to take away parts
of the German Empire, and that all the small nations round the Russian
territory obtained their independence as a first step to bribery and
use against Russia herself.
But to let Ireland have independence is a different story. Despite
Ireland's wonderful unity and solidarity on the issue of separation
from Britain, the Coalition Government violently persists in keeping
its hold on Erin.
Nothing but loathing and disgust must animate any straight-thinking
person when he or she recalls the continuously repeated cry that Britain
must release German democracy from the blight of Kaiserism and Junkerism
and Prussianism, and recollects the lying bleat that the Bolsheviks,
in deposing Kerensky, had over-ridden the principle of democracy, and
that, though a minority, they held the reins of power in rustic Russia.
As a matter of simple fact, the alleged 'dictatorship by terrorists'
was the stock argument used all last year by Winston Churchill and
his press puppets to justify the spending of close on two hundred million
pounds in the direct and indirect attempt to overthrow the vast Russian
Communist Republic. Even yet Britain is chary about trading with Russia
because of Russia's alleged repudiation of the principle of democracy.
To any right-thinking person Britain's retention of Ireland is the
world's most startling instance of a 'dictatorship by terrorists',
as Britain rules Ireland against Irish wishes with policemen armed
with bombs and a huge army equipped with over 40 tanks and as many
aeroplanes, machine guns galore, and all the other beautiful manifestations
of Christian brotherhood, love, and charity.
Democracy in Britain means rule by a clear majority vote, although
in some cases Trade Unions insist on a two-to-one majority. How did
Ireland vote at the General Election in 1918?
Sinn Féiners and Redmondites polled 1,211,516 votes or 79.3 per cent
of the total votes; the Unionists polled 271,455 or 17.8 per cent;
and the Independents and Labourists polled 45,939 or 2.9 per cent.
Obviously, the vote shows that by 4 to 1 the people in Ireland wish
to look after their own affairs. That overwhelming vote satisfies
the most stringent demands of democracy inside Trade Union and Co-operative
circles.
This Irish decision was re-affirmed in January, 1920, at the Municipal
Elections, when 95 per cent of the townships outside Ulster fell into
the hands of the Republicans under a system of Proportional Representation.
Even 'Derry and Lurgan in Ulster were taken from the Unionists, and
in Lisburn, Dungannon, and Cookstown the Carsonites have only a bare
majority.
The complete statistics of Municipal Elections show that in Leinster
36 out of 38 towns were won by Republicans and Nationalists, in Connaught
9 out of 10, in Munster 32 out of 32, and in Ulster 21 out of 47.
That is not all. The Republicans are now controlling and policing 21
Counties, and news has just arrived that in Ulster the Sinn Féiners
and Nationalists combined have captured County Tyrone with 11 against
9, and County Fermanagh also with 11 against 9. Great gains have also
been registered in the other four of the special Ulster counties, although
the final results are not out at the moment of writing.
If all these decisions do not clearly indicate the mind of the majority
in Ireland, then elections will never establish any definite verdict.
Britain has obviously no excuse for the flooding of Ireland with troops,
and it must be British Labour's bounden duty to see that these soldiers,
mainly boys of 18, be withdrawn and let the Irish settle their own
affairs. If the minority cannot stand up for themselves, let them emigrate.
That is what Lord French and the Coalitionists wish 200,000 young Irishmen
to do. They are trying to starve these youths out of their native land.
That is why Clyde capitalists gladly engage the Irish. The Government
tells them to do so, as Irishmen in Scotland are less dangerous than
in Ireland; whereas Scotsmen will submit to unemployment and starvation
and even commit suicide rather than annoy the Government or the bosses.
Instead of blaming Irishmen for stealing their jobs, Scotsmen should
blame the Government and the capitalists, who are responsible for the
influx of Irishmen to the Clyde and the west coast of England. If Ulstermen
cannot tolerate an Irish Republic, let them take a taste of emigration.
The Protestant camouflage
The Govemment defends its persistent policy of retaining Ireland by
alleging that it is its sacred duty to protect the Orange Protestants,
who would have a rough time of it if the Irish Catholics held full
sway in an Irish Republic. This line of argument was good bluff in
1914, but cannot hold water today with clear-headed people, who are
nimble-witted enough to put two and two together.
Just remember Britain's excuse for entry into the war. Was it not
to defend poor little Belgium against Germany? Even Lloyd George
tried
on that 'wheeze' on 'Xmas, 1915, in St Andrew's Hall, Glasgow, when
he came to persuade the Clyde workers to accept dilution of labour.
But everyone ought to know that the Belgians are Catholics and the
Prussians Protestants.
Does anyone really believe that Britain fought the greatest world war
to protect Catholics against Protestants on the Continent, and now
is preparing to turn the Emerald Isle red with Catholic blood to protect
Protestants?
Sir Henry Wilson, Field Marshall, in the middle of May, 1920, blew
the gaff on the Belgian bluff at the Union Jack Club when he blurted
out in indiscreet military fashion that Britain entered the war to
save her own skin.
For saying the same, in other words of course, I was sentenced to three
years and then to five years' penal servitude. Sir Henry obviously
ought to be sent to Peterhead quarry for the rest of his natural!
Sir Henry is perfectly right in saying that Britain entered the war
for selfish ends – the preservation of British capitalist predominance
in the worid. May not the same reason explain the stubborn insistence
that Ireland shall not get independence?
I think it does. Britain murdered men to steal Egypt because of the
Suez Canal, and is going to keep Egypt, although no Ulster exists there.
What is the motive behind the retention of Ireland? I think the real
reason is not the Ulstermen, whom the Government loves as ardently
as the citizens of that Indian city called Amritsar, where General
Dyer (or Killer) wiped out over 500 to prove to the poor people of
India the abounding love of Britain towards the poor heathen!
Britain's real motive
What, then, is Britain's real motive for its bull-dog grip of Érin's
Isle? Ireland stands between Britain and the Atlantic Ocean, on which
British ships must freely sail, in case of war, to preserve the people's
food supplies. If Ireland were an independent republic and formed an
alliance with America, which Bottomley in John Bull now calls 'Britain's
Next Enemy', then in the event of a war (which is coming on much faster
than the late war with Germany) Irish ports would be the base of operations
of the American fleet and Irish soil would be the base of operations
of the American army. Britain might thus be bottled up by America and
Ireland combined, as Britain bottled up Germany and starved her into
surrender.
That this war with America is approaching fast I prove in another pamphlet
written last year (1919) and entitled The Coming War with America.
Lord Leverhulme has bought up some of the isles off the west coast
of Scotland, Lewis and Harris particularly, not only to catch fish
but to make harbours, roads, houses, stores, railways, etc., for the
British navy in case of war with America. For the same reason Stranraer
is being also made a big fishing centre. So, also, are necessary precautions
being taken in the Bristol Channel, south of Ireland.
Last year I calculated that this war was bound to come in five or six
years' time; but recent events show that the fight may burst out at
any moment. The five big bully-beef trusts of Chicago, helped by the
bankers, are trying to corner the world's food supplies; so also is
Britain. The Standard Oil Trust of America, backed by all the big interests
of America, is making desperate efforts to corner the oil supply of
the world; so also is Britain. Both sides are accusing the other of
greedily trying to monopolize the world's oil resources. America is
in process of stealing Mexico to use Mexican oil in her navy in case
of 'eventualities'; Britain has stolen Egypt outright now, and is in
process of stealing Mesopotamia and Persia to secure the Anglo-Persian
Oil Company, which dominates the oil and mineral resources of those
countries and in which the British Government has millions of pounds.
Britain has determined to run her naval and merchant fleet with oil
to get out of the clutches of the Miners' Federation, particularly
the revolutionary South Wales miners. Hence the need to control the
oil resources of the world. Hence the present bitter fight with America
to get a controlling grip over these resources.
This delicate situation, admitted by Sir H. Wilson to be as critical
as the one in July, 1914, explains why Britain allowed Comrade Krassin
to come to London and see Lloyd George. Up till the present Britain
has blockaded Russia, refused to see Russia's trade representatives,
and refused to trade with that vast Communist country. Why has she
so suddenly reversed her policy? The only feasible explanation is that
she fears the American situation, and wishes to secure food and raw
materials, particularly Russian oil, in case of a breakdown of good
relationships with America. Do not be deceived into believing that
Britain's new Russian policy is dictated by humanitarian motives. It
is her selfish ends that dictate her policy all the time and every
time.
Brutal treatment of Ireland
Her brutal treatment of Ireland, more blatant today than ever before,
indicates that quite clearly. Immediately the Armistice was signed
more troops poured into Ireland, not as a precaution against a possible
rising but as an irritant. Meetings were deliberately suppressed with
brutal arrogance, then football matches and other sports were stopped
and the spectators and players scattered with violence, concerts and
entertainments were forbidden -- even a concert run to provide money
to establish a Labour College in Dublin; in fact, the social life of
the people was calculatedly interfered with to create an open rising
that would give Britain the chance of having an 'Amritsar slaughter'
in Ireland to settle the Irish for another generation at least.
Those of us who are conversant with the irritating methods adopted
in prisons, at Socialist meetings, and in Ireland can readily realize
that the people of Amritsar were irritated by British army provocateurs
into the jeering at General Dyer that afforded the excuse for the most
cold blooded butchery ever perpetrated by any conquering race. If the
Irish had shot down and wounded as many Orangemen in the streets of
Belfast, what a hellish howl the prostitute pressmen, politicians,
and pulpiteers of Britain would have set up!
The Irish only escaped a 'blood bath' by calmly and meekly submitting
to every calculated effort to arouse them to violence. Senator Walsh
and others from America visited Ireland, got the drift of affairs,
and then returned to America to place the plight of Ireland before
America. America was only too pleased to find some excuse for blackening
Britain, so Americans saw that the world learned all about Britain's
brutalities in Ireland (and India, Egypt, and the West Indies, too,
I daresay). British patriots cannot complain of America doing this,
as Britain has similarly blackened the Turks for massacring Armenians,
Germans for massacring women and children, and Russians for running
the whole gamut of social crime.
Thereafter, de Valera went to America to get funds to help the Irish
Parliament or Dáil Éireann. Appeals for funds also appeared in the
Irish press. Then followed suppressions right and left, as Britain
was determined to stand no rival Parliament in Ireland:
September 20
The entire Republican press in Ireland was suppressed.
October 15
Sinn Féin and Republican organisations in Dublin suppressed.
October 21
Weekly meetings of Sinn Féin Central Club suppressed.
November 21
Military and police raid headquarters of the Republican Government
and arrest and imprison the staff.
November 27
Sinn Féin and Republican organizations suppressed throughout Ireland.
December 10
Sinn Féin and Republican headquarters ordered to be closed.
December 12
Sinn Féin leaders, including the Secretary of the Sinn Féin organisation,
arrested in Dublin and Provinces and deported without trial. Republican
headquarters again raided and literature confiscated.
During 1919 and the early months of 1920, 66 of the Irish MPs elected
in 1918 were sent to prison after farces of a trial or without trial
at all. Only 7 escaped prison by leaving Ireland shortly after their
election in 1918.
Since the Municipal Elections in January, 1920, 35 councillors have
been arrested, and attempts were made to arrest at least 36 other councillors.
On March 3 armed military raided the Women Workers' Club, the Irish
Women Workers' Union, Liberty Hall, the Socialist Party of Ireland
headquarters, the Grocers' Assistants' Union headquarters, and the
Irish Drapers' Assistants' headquarters – all in Dublin. At the same
timeAlderman Wm O'Brien, the leader of the Irish Labour movement,
was snatched away and smuggled into England, where he was kept in prison
without trial.
Immediately after that it was learned that on March 1, 1920, Mr.
Alan Bell had commanded high bank officials to appear at the Police
Court,
Inns' Quay, Dublin, with all books and documents used in their banks,
so that they might be examined by Government officials. The purpose
was to trace all Sinn Féin moneys, and also to know all the business
of prominent supporters of the Sinn Fein cause so as to crush them
down to poverty.
Bell issued the summonses as Resident Magistrate for the County of
Dublin. He first appeared as an assistant to Jas E. French, chief
of the English Secret Service in Ireland. As a result of Wm O'Brien's
exposures in 1884 of Dublin Castle immorality, French was convicted
of un natural crime. Bell acted as his agent-provocateur in the West
of Ireland in the Land League times, one of his exploits being the
arrest of Henry George, author of Progress and Poverty, during his
visit to Ireland in the eighties. Bell was the secret agent of the
London Times during the Piggott forgeries' case, in which Piggott
confessed he had been bribed to forge the handwriting of Parnell
so as to involve
Parnell in high treason. But for the confession Parnell might have
been shot. Since then Bell carried on his dirty work as an English
spy in Ireland.
He is the scoundrel dragged in broad daylight from a Dublin car and
shot. What self-respecting man or woman can blame the Irish for ridding
the earth of such a foul skunk? Who ever was sorry for a Judas?
Irish 'crimes'
When even the first suppressions in September failed to draw the Irish
into open revolt, the British Government had to do something to justify
its base, brutal, and bloody occupation of plucky Ireland. My opinion
is that it, through Dublin Castle, arranged the assassination of detectives
and police and then blamed the Irish. The culmination came when it
arranged the attempt on Lord French near the spot where Cavendish and
Burke were killed in the eighties. French was in an armoured motor.
Unfortunately for Britain, few sensible people pitied the Flanders'
failure, and doubtless many who lost sons under French would not have
been at all sorry had he crossed the black stream. It is certain that
the day the Irish wish to put his lights out, off he goes.
The Government seized the excuse to arm the police with bombs and convert
police stations into barracks. Then the Irish began those attacks on
the police system that have absolutely demoralized it, in fact have
virtually broken it up altogether. The Government now seeks by faked
statistics to show that the Irish have done this for ordinary criminal
purposes.
As a matter of fact there is no crime the Government has not incited
the police and the soldiers to perpetuate in this war to the knife
with Ireland. Since May, 1916, 'til December, 1919, the Government
in Ireland has been responsible for 59 murders, 2,084 deportations,
575 armed assaults on unarmed civilians, 14,153 raids on private
houses, 5,041 arrests, 2,038 sentences, 369 proclamations and suppressions,
53 suppressions of papers, 506 courts-martial: a total of 25,378.
Since
January, 1920, matters have become worse. Let us take the week ending
April 17. Raids 1,135; arrests, 260; sentences, 2; proclamations
and suppressions, 2; courts-martial, 2; armed assaults, 16; deportations,
92; murders, 4; a total of 1,513.
Mild raid described
The following letter was sent on March 9, 1920, by Major Erskine
Childers, DSC, to the General Officer Commanding-in-chief, General
Headquarters,
Dublin. Childers is the son of a former Chancellor of the Exchequer.
His famous novel, The Riddle of the Sands, warned England
of the German menace. He has also written one of the volumes of the London
Times 'History of the War'.
'Sir, – I received the honour of a visit last night from a tank belonging
to your command at the somewhat inconvenient hour of 1 a.m. I do not
demur to this. War is war.
But I suggest that it might be in the ultimate interest both of the
visitors and the visited on these occasions if a code of etiquette
or deportment were imposed upon the former. It would, perhaps, be
unreasonable to complain of bayonets being flashed in the eyes of
my small boy in
his cot, and of similar means of impressing the household generally
with a proper awe of the forces under your command. But it is a matter
of legitimate complaint that a young subaltern (of by no means attractive
appearance, if you will forgive me) should on entering the house
stroll into my drawing-room in my presence puffing a cigarette, and
should
continue to refresh himself in this manner after I had invited him
to desist. The trifling scene which ensued was ended by the intervention
of another officer of no less polished breeding, who decreed an ingenious
compromise under which the cigarette was to be thrown unextinguished
upon the carpet. "Upon the carpet", was the express injunction
delivered with studied insolence by this young carpet-knight.
Thus I was to win my point about the consumption of the cigarette,
and he was to save his dignity by burning a hole in my carpet.
The point may seem trivial, but is it so? When armies are eventually
withdrawn from occupied territory – and may I, without the least
offence, express the hope that yours will be eventually withdrawn
from ours?
– it is of the most vital importance that an army should leave behind
it a record for civility and humanity in the performance even of
its most obnoxious duties. Surely none can be more obnoxious and
more easily
provocative of exasperation than these midnight raids upon civilians'
houses, about 19,000 of which have taken place, I understand, in
the last two years, often, as in my case, on false information, and
often
resulting in indignities and hardships infinitely worse than anything
I experienced.
Though I am no longer a member of the British Army, long service in
it during the war, and the regard which I still retain for the best
among its traditions, encourages me to address these remarks for your
consideration.
I have the honour to remain, Faithfully yours,
ERSKINE CHILDERS, late Major, RAF.'
That the attacks on the Irish are continuous, widespread, and numerous
is proved by the statistics issued by the Sinn Feiners themselves.
Here is a typical 1920 weeks' work by Dublin Castle, ending April
17:
Raids, 1,135; arrests, 260; sentences, 2; proclamations, 2; courts-martial,
2; armed assaults, 16; deportations, 92; murders, 4. This information
is carefully suppressed by the Government, so that ordinary people
are forced to come to entirely wrong conclusions as to the real
situation in Ireland.
Acts of Aggression in Ireland
1919
February 12
Pat Gavin shot dead by soldiers at the Curragh Camp.
April 6
Robt. Byrne shot dead by police in Limerick Hospital.
April 26
Al. Walsh shot dead by police at Dungarvan.
April 29
Two men shot by police at Longford.
June 5
Matthew Murphy, Dundalk, shot dead by soldiers at Dundalk.
June 16
Michael Rice (60 years) and his son, Martin, shot dead in his house
by police.
August 14
F. Murphy. Glan (15 years) shot dead by soldiers firing into his
father's house at midnight.
September 9
Fermoy sacked by soldiers.
October 10
Boy shot at Banbridge by police.
November 6
Kinsale sacked by soldiers.
November 12
Cork partly sacked by soldiers.
November 20
Motorists shot by police at Sligo for not halting.
November 24
Civilians shot at Tipperary by police.
December 29
Laurence Kennedy murdered by police at Phoenix Park, Dublin.
1920
January 6
Dr. Keane, Ennistymon, shot by police while on his medical rounds.
January 19
Civilians at Enniscorthy shot by police.
January 20
M. Darcy, Cooraclare, drowned while police held off would-be rescuers.
January 22
Thurles wrecked by soldiers.
February 4
Man and girl shot dead in Limerick by soldiers and police.
February 14
Jas. O'Brien shot dead at Rathdrum by police.
So I might continue itemizing the bloody butchery right down to the
time of writing this pamphlet were I not sick of the whole murderous
business.
Ireland's reply
To expect the Irish to accept crushing and blackening both is to
stretch expectation and endurance beyond the limit. So the Irish
have naturally
replied by laying low policemen and detectives. Policemen are now
resigning by the hundred. Police barracks have been blown up and
policemen driven
from whole stretches of the country. The Sinn Féiners are, however,
establishing their own police and their own courts, which now control
21 of Ireland's 32 counties. Britain's police system is virtually
destroyed in vast stretches of Ireland, never again to be re-established.
Naturally, also, Irish dockers and railwaymen have followed the
example of the London dockers, who took their cue from The
Daily Herald and
refused to load the Jolly George with ammunition for Poland.
Irishmen now refuse to supply the Army of Occupation with
the ammu nition that
may be used to kill themselves when off industrial duty. This
is surely the most sensible thing Irishmen have ever done
in their history of
toil and trouble. Irish Labour may call an Irish General Strike
to force the withdrawal of troops from Ireland. Meantime,
Irish rail waymen
have asked the Executive Committee of the National Union of Railwaymen
(NUR) to take action to prevent ammunition being sent to Ireland.
The NUR has put the responsibility on to the shoulders of
the Triple Alliance
(Transport Workers, Miners, and NUR), and the Triple Alliance
in turn is slipping the responsibility on to those genial
old fogies who constitute
the Trade Union Congress Committee. By the time these benevolent
old gents make up their mind to deputize the Prime Minister,
Ireland will
have established a Republic, and have then passed on to a Socialist
Republic herself!
Are the rank and file going to submit to the usual dilatoriness,
or are they going to force the pace themselves by taking direct
action
themselves?
Britain is pouring more and more troops into Ireland, and now
the navy is being called into play. A terrible tragedy may be
perpetrated by
Britain before Labour has realized the full gravity of the situation.
It is therefore essential that drastic action he taken very soon.
The real centre of the Irish fight is Liberty Hall and the Transport
Workers' Union, founded by the mighty Jim Larkin, now doing ten
years in an American prison because he was an active member of
the Communist
Party and carried on by the martyred Jim Connolly 'til Easter
Week, 1916.
Should Ireland get a Republic the class war will then burst out
and be fought out till Irish Labour wins and establishes Communism
finally
again in the 'Ould Counthrie'.
This new phase in Irish life ought to be the inciting influence
to British Labour, for Labour everywhere must ally against the
common
enemy, Capitalism, and destroy it to make way for World Communism.
The victory of British and Irish Labour will pave the way for
American Labour, the triumph of which will eliminate the possibility
of the
threatened war with America.
Ireland's victory is obviously the undoubted prelude to Labour's
triumph throughout the world, when robbery shall give place to
justice in the
mighty Communist Commonwealth, and when with the scrapping of
armies and navies, mankind can live in peace to enjoy the fruits
of their
labour.
A General Strike then, for the withdrawal of British troops from
Ireland, and the demand of the release of Jim Larkin (America)
and his brother,
Pete Larkin (Australia).
PS – Since writing this pamphlet the Glasgow Herald in a leader
on Tuesday, June 8, 1920, entitled The Army in Ireland, gloats
over the fact that Scots regiments are pouring into Ireland and
others are
held in readiness. It seems the Scots are being used to crush
the Irish. Let Labour effectively reply.